Well, if Varsha's going to nitpick (see her reply below), I don't think I'll have the time and energy to get into a protracted verbal battle. Just wondering though:

• How sacred does Varsha hold the SC when it comes out with judgments like the one I quoted in my mail? The answer to that can be seen in sentences ending with ellipses ...



• When the highest court in the land has passed a verdict of "not guilty", what gives Varsha the right to pass verdict (Hell, those convicted ... *are* guilty, no two ways about it...) on the accused?

The facts of the Radhabai Chawl massacre case are that ... The accused's counsel rejected the deposition of eye- witnesses as "totally unworthy of credit" and the judges, too, believed that.