Saturday, September 21, 2002
posted by Kensy |
From: "Bhosle Varsha"
To: "Kensy Joseph"
Subject: Re: "Sanctity" of the Supreme Court
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 21:25:32 +0530
> ... the Supreme Court ruled that the police had framed the 11 Muslims
"somehow tried to get them identified through witnesses who belonged to
community from which the people were burnt alive." You see, two of the
who died had not identified the accused in their dying statements...
------------- where have i criticised the supreme court or asked for a
review of its judgement...? did any hindutvawadi...?
> Quoting precedent, 11 persons of the Bombay blasts case were released
bail and 40 more followed. Then, the Act itself was scrapped -- by the
of the communal card. And now those convicted by the TADA court have
set free by the Supreme Court...
> Hell, those convicted by the TADA court *are* guilty, no two ways
it. But the minority syndrome won't let our dunder-headed liberals see
that way. All that the controversial judgment will do is put the
backs up a little more. It has mine.
> My question to you simply is:
> Why do you accuse the "secularists" of a "wrong" (criticising an SC
judgment) when you have done it yourself in the past?
> Or is it that the SC is "sacred" only when its judgments agree with
----------- see above.
> PS - I don't even want to go into the Arundhati Roy incident.
-------------- don't. i wouldn't bother to answer.
> PS(ii) - A copy of this mail will be put up on my weblog -
------------ put up my reply too.